Melanie Ford Senior Casework Manager Independent Police Complaints Commission

On Wednesday, 19 December 2012, Mr Cercel receives the result of the complaint he raised against Mr Larkin, complaint which was investigated by Melanie Ford, Senior Casework Manager at the Independent Police Complaints Commission:

CONCLUSION

      Mr Cercel was victim of criminal offences and other human rights infringements by police officers of West Mercia Police Force – Worcester Police Station since 13 August 2011.

Between 13 August 2011 and 10 January 2012, Mr Cercel tried achieving equality and respect for his human rights by himself, without any help from any agency.

As it was obvious he will not succeed, since 30 January 2012 he started contacting and involving the I.P.C.C.

The I.P.C.C. has not followed procedures and failed to record “the more serious complaint” but sent it back to the Professional Standards Department of the police force to be dealt with as a “local resolution”.

At a later stage, the only result of the decision of involving the I.P.C.C. was that being aware of the investigation against them, the police officers started humiliating more and more the victim.

We can assume that at this stage the police officers (probably from past experience) were aware that nothing will happen to them.

The decision of Mr Andrew Larking took on 29 November 2012 seems to confirm this assumption.

TO CONCLUDE:

Mr Cercel was exposed to criminal offences, exposed to aggravated discriminative behaviour and “institutional racism” by members of West Mercia Police Force.

He was told that the only body that can take action against them is the I.P.C.C.

Months later, enduring a very humiliating wave of revenge from police officers who in their pride wanted to show him that he is less of a human being in comparison to them, Mr Cercel received humiliating correspondence as a result of his complaint, a response that could easily afect anyone`s health condition: “the police officers have not evicted you, that is your perception”.

This proves that foreigners have their racial vulnerabilities exploited in the United Kingdom both by civil offenders and by the bodies that should prevent those events from happening.

Internal Investigation Unit Independent Police Complaint Commission

On 3rd December 2012, Mr Cercel receives confirmation of his complaint against Mr Andrew Larkin.

EVIDENCE:

Internal Investigation Unit Independent Police Complaint Commission

On 30 November Mr Cercel complaints to the IIU of the IPCC against Mr Andrew Larkin and provides evidence against him and requests that he be taken to the Crown Prosecution Service to be criminally prosecuted.

EVIDENCE:

HATE OFFENDER Mr Andrew Larkin Independent Police Complaint Commission

As he was still in a state of shock, as the response of Mr Larkin meant that every HATE OFFENDER will continue to harass Mr Cercel and infringe his human rights, realising that the best way to get answers to his questions is by email, Mr Cercel emails Mr Larkin.

EVIDENCE:

Shortly after, Mr Larkin replies:

RACIST Mr Andrew Larking IPCC

Upon reading the findings of Mr Andrew Larkin, Mr Cercel calls him – as he was advised – to enquire about the shocking new he just received.

Please pay attention to the following discovery:

“Mr Cercel was not illegally evicted by police officers, as they just came to the house to prevent a breach of peace – we all know that the landlords were very aggressive and shouting and threatening – and that intervention ended with Mr Cercel being made homeless so that the landlords could be calmed down so that there would be no breach of peace”.

YOUTUBE EVIDENCE:

RACISM Mr Andrew Larkin Independent Police Complaint Commission

On 29 November 2012, Mr Andrew Larkin emails the victim explaining that his appeal has not been upheld as he has wrongfully been reporting “civil issue” and also because these are “civil issues” but not criminal ones, it was accepted for the police officers to disregards procedures and expose him to discriminating behaviour.

EVIDENCE:

LETTER

see page "Beyond Any Doubt"

Second future NR Appeal

On 28 November 2012, Mr Cercel tries recording a second NR Appeal by providing evidence that Ms Louise Beech Robert from the Professional Standards Department of West Mercia Police Force is continuing to make up laws and procedures as she is obviously disregarding existing ones only to humiliate Mr Cercel.

EVIDENCE :

NR Appeal – non recorded appeal confirmation

On 20 November Mr Cercel receives confirmation of his NR Appeal.

EVIDENCE:

NR Appeal – non recorded appeal

Receiving previous advice that he must re-record the complaints and failing for the 3^rd consecutive time, Mr Cercel on 10 November contacts the IPCC to raise a NR appeal against West Mercia Police Force.

EVIDENCE:

Independent Police Complaint Commission 10 October 2012

As he was preparing for the date around 14 October, date in which a “more serious” complaint will be escalated against the police officers, our victim emails the IPCC with links to online evidence against the hate offenders .

Later that day he will be told that the wait time will be increased by 8 more weeks :( .

EVIDENCE:

Obvious victimisation Independent Police Complaint Commission

On 28 September 2012, upon being provided with obvious evidence that he is being victimised by the police force, forwards the evidence for the attention of the IPCC.

EVIDENCE:

Independent Police Complaint Commission Casework Administrator Jack Paynter

Mr Paynter replies to Mr Cercel on 29 August with updates and acknowledgments in regards to his complaint.

EVIDENCE:

Independent Police Complaint Commission Casework Administrator Jack Paynter

On the same day, 23 August, Mr Cercel replies to the letter Mr Paynter wrote to him on 1^st of August. 
 

EVIDENCE:

Independent Police Complaint Commission Casework Administrator Jack Paynter

On Thursday 23 August, our victim email Mr Paynter and provides updates on his case.

EVIDENCE:

Independent Police Complaint Commission Casework Administrator Jack Paynter

On the 1^st of August, Mr Jack Paynter provides the answer from his manager … only problem is that it appears to be signed by him !

EVIDENCE:

Independent Police Complaint Commission Casework Administrator Jack Paynter

After the first email from 31^st July, Mr Cercel contacted by phone Mr Jack Paynter, Mr who advised him to write the below.

EVIDENCE:

Mainland Europe, undertaking medical treatment

As he was preparing to go abroad and undertake medical treatment, our victim updates the IPCC via email, on 31^st July 2012.

EVIDENCE:

Independent Police Complaint Commission Casework Administrator Jack Paynter

Further to Mr Cercel's email from 17 July, Mr Paynter replies. 
It is very important to take into consideration the information provided, especially the: 

“... is unable to access any of the below evidence, he or she will contact you”; 

as you will see at a later case, that was the case but no contact has been made.

EVIDENCE:

Independent Police Complaint Commission & Chief Inspector Jerry William Reakes and Investigator Peter Moore

On 17 July 2012, Mr Cercel, finding out that although he made criminal complaints against Chief Inspector Jerry William Reakes and Investigator Peter Moore; the two police staff are continuing to discriminate him; he emails the IPCC to have this information taken into consideration.

EVIDENCE: