On Wednesday, 19 December 2012, Mr Cercel receives the result of the complaint he raised against Mr Larkin, complaint which was investigated by Melanie Ford, Senior Casework Manager at the Independent Police Complaints Commission:
Independent Police Complaint Commission
Independent Police Complaint Commission - covering criminal offences and discriminative behaviour of Police Forces throughout the United Kingdom !
Thursday, 20 December 2012
Melanie Ford Senior Casework Manager Independent Police Complaints Commission
Friday, 7 December 2012
CONCLUSION
Mr
Cercel was victim of criminal offences and other human rights
infringements by police officers of West Mercia Police Force –
Worcester Police Station since 13 August 2011.
Between
13 August 2011 and 10 January 2012, Mr Cercel tried achieving
equality and respect for his human rights by himself, without any
help from any agency.
As it
was obvious he will not succeed, since 30 January 2012 he started
contacting and involving the I.P.C.C.
The
I.P.C.C. has not followed procedures and failed to record “the more
serious complaint” but sent it back to the Professional Standards
Department of the police force to be dealt with as a “local
resolution”.
At
a later stage, the only result of the decision of involving the
I.P.C.C. was that being aware of the investigation against them, the
police officers started humiliating more and more the victim.
We
can assume that at this stage the police officers (probably from past
experience) were aware that nothing will happen to them.
The
decision of Mr
Andrew Larking took on 29
November 2012 seems to confirm this assumption.
TO CONCLUDE:
Mr
Cercel was exposed to criminal offences, exposed to aggravated
discriminative behaviour and “institutional racism” by members of
West Mercia Police Force.
He
was told that the only body that can take action against them is the
I.P.C.C.
Months
later, enduring a very humiliating wave of revenge from police
officers who in their pride wanted to show him that he is less of a
human being in comparison to them, Mr Cercel received humiliating
correspondence as a result of his complaint, a response that could
easily afect anyone`s health condition: “the police officers have
not evicted you, that is your perception”.
This
proves that foreigners have their racial vulnerabilities exploited in
the United Kingdom both by civil offenders and by the bodies that
should prevent those events from happening.
Monday, 3 December 2012
Internal Investigation Unit Independent Police Complaint Commission
On 3rd December 2012, Mr Cercel receives confirmation of his complaint against Mr Andrew Larkin.
EVIDENCE:
Internal Investigation Unit Independent Police Complaint Commission
On 30 November Mr Cercel
complaints to the IIU of the IPCC against Mr Andrew Larkin and
provides evidence against him and requests that he be taken to the
Crown Prosecution Service to be criminally prosecuted.
EVIDENCE:
HATE OFFENDER Mr Andrew Larkin Independent Police Complaint Commission
As he was still in a
state of shock, as the response of Mr Larkin meant that every HATE
OFFENDER will continue to harass Mr Cercel and infringe his human
rights, realising that the best way to get answers to his questions
is by email, Mr Cercel emails Mr Larkin.
EVIDENCE:
Shortly after, Mr
Larkin replies:
RACIST Mr Andrew Larking IPCC
Upon reading the findings
of Mr Andrew Larkin, Mr Cercel calls him – as he was advised – to
enquire about the shocking new he just received.
Please pay attention to
the following discovery:
“Mr Cercel was not
illegally evicted by police officers, as they just came to the house
to prevent a breach of peace – we all know that the landlords were
very aggressive and shouting and threatening – and that
intervention ended with Mr Cercel being made homeless so that the
landlords could be calmed down so that there would be no breach of
peace”.
YOUTUBE EVIDENCE:
RACISM Mr Andrew Larkin Independent Police Complaint Commission
On 29 November 2012, Mr
Andrew Larkin emails the victim explaining that his appeal has not
been upheld as he has wrongfully been reporting “civil issue” and
also because these are “civil issues” but not criminal ones, it
was accepted for the police officers to disregards procedures and
expose him to discriminating behaviour.
EVIDENCE:
LETTER
see page "Beyond Any Doubt"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)